Supreme Court refuses to revive Prop 8 challenge". Retrieved March 28, As soon as they said they were interested in a wedding cake, Phillips told them he did not create cakes for same-sex couples. Cooke ed. And this was not trivial to them, by any means".
United Statescontinuing its longstanding practice of defending all federal laws challenged in court. The intimate association protected by this right was central to Griswold v.
The Court overruled its prior decision in Baker v. Supreme Court's action in a similar case, Baker v. Archived from the original on 26 December Ohio Dec. Ohio's director of health appealed Obergefell v. NBC News. For now, civil rights proponents can claim a clear victory in this important workplace discrimination case that broadly expanded the rights of LGBT employees across the country.
Alabama Today. The Big Story [AP]. HaslamLove v. Himes for the purposes of briefing and oral argument. Due to the "substantial and continuing harm" and the "instability and uncertainty" caused by state marriage laws differing with regard to same-sex couples, and because respondent states had conceded that a ruling requiring them to marry same-sex couples would undermine their refusal to hold valid same-sex marriages performed in other states, the Court also held that states must recognize same-sex marriages legally performed in other states.
They ask nine judges on this Court to enshrine their definition of marriage in the Federal Constitution and thus put it beyond the reach of the normal democratic process for the entire Nation. There may be an initial inclination in these cases to proceed with caution—to await further legislation, litigation, and debate.
Retrieved February 13, Brown , respectively. Archived from the original on June 20,