If we gain rights in California, then the majority of Filipino gay and lesbians will probably have opportunity to start families and be happy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. The couple vowed to bring the case to the Supreme Court of South Korea. Main article: Timeline of same-sex marriage.
We should never be afraid, we should always look for new ways to jump ahead. Journal of Homosexuality. Spain was the third country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage, which has been legal since 3 Julyand was supported by the majority of the Spanish people.
The negative would like to convince you that there exists a certain set of requirements for a marriage that reflect the best possible conditions for which two individuals can happily live together. The affirmative argument: I do not believe marriage is a right that should be enjoyed by all people if the current reason marriage exists is to benefit society.
The negative claims that it is irrelevant whether or not a couple chooses to procreate, as long as they are able to, then they can get married. The negative makes the mistake, yet again, of claiming that marriage should be solely about procreation and the proper raising of children, and still failing to give the voters a single reason as to why these claims should be accepted.
Pero kapag tinanong mo sila kung same sex marriage debate negative side tagalog in Los Angeles ba ng utos sa Leviticus ay dapat sundin ang sagot nila hindi. The negative arguments:. Their relationship is natural in the sense that man and woman were made for each other, and that they again, can connect sexual intercourse with love and procreation which is all good good good for society.
Reasons to accept my argument:. Con Marriage and Procreation My opponent basically says that because homosexuals can procreate through artificial insemination then they should be able to get married and that marriage commitments are based around love and all humans have the ability to love each other.
Follow netivistorg. My opponent tries to defend his argument by saying that marriage should be between a man and a woman because procreation is possible. Government had a role in marriage, however that role should be limited. My opponent again claims that the government must draw the line at marriage between men and women and fails to explain why, deferring to his previous arguments, which have all fallen.
Report this Comment.
Main article: Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands. The proportion in same-sex marriages 7. Marriage not performed except by amparo despite Supreme Court order. The Court said that governments "must recognise and guarantee all the rights that are derived from a family bond between people of the same sex".
See also: LGBT rights opposition.