Santa Cruz. Equality for All was the lead organization opposed to Proposition 8. April 5-December 23,
The opinion california same sex marriage ban unconstitutional in Sacramento was signed by 13 men who represented various Christian and Jewish groups. Retrieved March 16, The Print Edition. Retrieved November 15, The court concluded that the trial court had correctly found Proposition 8 to have no purpose other than to impose the majority's private disapproval of gays, lesbians, and their relationships through the public lawand to take away from them the designation of marriage and its recognized societal status.
Opponents of gay marriage planned to ask the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling, which came more than a year after the appeals court panel heard arguments in the case. California is the only one of those states where the ability for gays to marry was granted then rescinded.
Most or all of article text: Garza, Jennifer November 6, June 20, Even some gay rights activists worried that it was too soon in the evolution of views toward same-sex marriage to ask the justices to intervene and declare that same-sex couples have the same right to marry as heterosexuals.
Download as PDF Printable version.
Legal challenges to Proposition 8 were presented by opponents quickly after its approval. Division Three of the First District Court of Appeal held extended oral argument on the cases on July 10, , before a three-judge panel. May 15,